Designs For Wellbeing
homepage

HPV cervical cancer vaccine Cervarix side effects?
'Government "facts" circulated for over a year were false and misleading'
says Grace Filby. 'The public should be offered an apology.'






UK HPV Vaccine programme errors + antidote to aluminium toxin
:
Pictures from an online presentation by Grace Filby BA(Hons) Cert Ed FRSA questioning the UK govt's HPV vaccine programme statistics about side effects e.g. arthralgia (joint pain) amongst school girls aged 12 upwards. Government minister Dawn Primarolo sent a letter of apology for the mistakes. Eventually the official online documents were altered but no reprints were issued. See Still_Life pdf for details about the antidote to aluminium toxin - silica-rich mineral waters. Grace Filby is a Science & Engineering Ambassador for STEMNET.


news
MHRA: "no evidence to suggest that the vaccine carries any long-term side effects"?
Grace Filby asks the MHRA to reconsider based on new evidence 28.7.10



MHRA definition of a serious reaction
27.10.09

HPV vaccine advertising campaign on local Surrey bus service

Grace Filby's report on the Cervarix Scientific Discussion
(pdf)
07.07.09

Grace Filby's summary report handed to Mark Simmonds MP
07.07.09

Grace Filby's Facebook album STILL LIFE explains findings of government errors and deception 13.6.09

Freedom of Information Officer confirms 50,000 faulty HPV jab leaflets 9.6.09

Faulty jab leaflets on Government website still online
6.6.09

Ex-Minister of State for Health Primarolo apologises for accidental error
4.6.09

Management in Practice ask if the vaccination programme should increase further
22.5.09

Holistic Health Alliance advice to reverse the negative side effects of a vaccine
13.1.09

10 quotations about Guillain-Barre Syndrome and vaccines
19.12.08

Up On The Pharm - poem 26.11.08

Video: HPV vaccine - check aluminium sensitivity first 1.11.08

Beating cervical cancer - the facts or not the facts? 19.10.08

Is the HPV cervical cancer vaccine "essential"? 16.10.08

Videos: cervical cancer jab 25.9.08


HPV vaccine side effects





Received 27.10.09
marked CONFIDENTIAL
ref: GENQ-00064524

Dear Ms Filby,

Re: The MHRA definition of a serious reaction

Thank you for your recent correspondence dated 19/10/2009.

I can confirm that the MHRA definition of a serious reaction is two fold and relates to whether a reaction term is considered serious according to our medical dictionary and also if the reporter considers the Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) report to be serious due to the following criteria:

  • Fatal
  • Life-threatening
  • Disabling
  • Incapacitating
  • Have resulted in, or prolonged, hospitalisation
  • Medically significant
  • Congenital abnormalities

Examples of serious reactions include arrhythmias, anaphylaxis and renal dysfunction.

Please note that in contrast a severe reaction is one that might not be life-threatening or disabling but can seriously affect an individual patient. For example, headaches are not normally considered serious in nature, but may be very severe.

I hope that this information is useful to you.

Kind Regards,

Saira Mahmood
Pharmacovigilance Scientist
Vigilance and Risk Management of Medicines
MHRA

Cc: Jenny Wong, Pharmacovigilance Risk Management Group





Photo: copyright Grace Filby 2009


CERVARIX – THE SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION
Report summary from Grace Filby BA(Hons) Cert Ed FRSA

handed to Mark Simmonds MP, Shadow Health Minister for Vaccines July 09


flag             
There are natural anti-virals for the regression of HPV infections and             cervical lesions. (p2)


 
flag            
The chemicals – official ‘Irritants’ – are entering the environment unchecked, but toxic to aquatic organisms.  (p3)
No risk assessment.  (p6-7)



flag           
Excessive mortality reported with dog and rat studies.   (p5)
Hair and claw tests not done? Lack of scientific rigour.
Faecal elimination omitted twice in conclusions. Unethical?



flag           
1 in 35 likelihood of a girl reporting a Serious Adverse Event.  (p15)
Unexplored pregnancy issues.



flag           
 Reported SAEs MAGICALLY reduced from 882 to 27.  (p16)




flag            
The 5 human fatalities could have been caused by the vaccine – danger of car crashes from seizures and fatigue.   (p22)




flag             
Sensitivity tests need to be carried out before any vaccination  – a kinesiologist can do this.   (p.27)




Freedom of Information Officer confirms 50,000 faulty HPV jab leaflets

9 June 2009

DE00000415265

Dear Ms Filby,
 
Thank you for your email of 19 May requesting, under the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act, information relating to the revision of the factsheet entitled Beating Cervical Cancer: The Facts.  Your email has been passed to me for reply.

You have raised a number of questions, which I have answered in turn.

•      Please could you let me know the print run figures and dates for  the original document ‘Beating cervical cancer - the facts’, reference number 288939_HPV_Factsheet.pdf.

The Department printed 50,000 copies in May 2008 of the HPV factsheet, The human papillomavirus: The virus, the diseases and the new HPV vaccine.  These were distributed during the summer to Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) and GPs in support of the HPV immunisation campaign starting in September 2008.  The factsheet and other materials were also published at www.immunisation.nhs.uk.

•      If any of them were recalled, how many?

No recall took place.  The printed factsheets had been widely distributed before the revised version was produced, and a recall would have been extremely difficult.

•      Please would you also inform me of the date of any print runs which have included the revised safety information, as per my FOI question dated 1st October 08 which pointed out the error in the statistics.

Under current policy, factsheets are web-only after the initial distribution and therefore there have been no reprints.  The revised factsheet was published at: www.immunisation.nhs.uk.   We understand that most of the target audience uses web-based information as a primary source. 

•      Could you also let me know whether an Erratum/Corrigendum message was ever sent out to make the safety information clear and accurate? If so, please inform me of the date, the wording and the number of copies sent out.

No erratum slips were printed or distributed to PCTs and GPs.

You may be interested to learn that there were 600,000 girls and young women in the first cohorts eligible for HPV immunisation from September 2008.  The accelerated catch-up programme has now made the vaccine available to greater numbers from April 2009, and this programme is supported by online resources.

I hope this reply is helpful.

If you have any queries about this email, please contact me. Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future communications.
 
If you are dissatisfied with the handling of your request, you have the right to ask for an internal review. Internal review requests should be submitted within two months of the date of receipt of the response to your original letter and should be addressed to:
 
Head of the Freedom of Information Team
Department of Health
Room 317
Richmond House
79 Whitehall,
London
SW1A 2NS
  




Ex-Minister of State for Health Primarolo apologises for accident

From the Rt Hon Dawn Primarolo MP, now Ex-Minister of State for Health: received 6.6.09

PO00000414115
Dear Ms. Filby
Thank you for your email of 14 May about the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme.

I am sorry that there was an accidental error in a publication last year about the HPV vaccine against cervical cancer. As soon as this was known, the Department corrected the error and published a revised version of the HPV factsheet, The human papillomavirus vaccine: The virus, the diseases and the new HPV vaccine, in November 2008. The original version of the HPV factsheet was removed from the website www.immunisation.nhs.uk at the same time.

You mention your concern that the original version of the factsheet is still available on the Department's website. As this appears not to be the case, I would appreciate if you could forward details of the web address concerned, so that we can ensure that there is no misunderstanding.

The HPV vaccine is a major breakthrough in public health, and the first vaccine that can directly prevent cancer. It would be a travesty if women were denied the potential that it offers because of scaremongering and supposition. The weight of evidence shows that the vaccine is safe, effective and capable of saving thousands of lives in the years ahead.

I believe that we should support and celebrate the saving of women's lives by vaccination against a preventable illness.

I hope this clarifies the Government's position on this matter.

Yours ever,
Dawn Primarolo
DAWN PRIMAROLO

Faulty jab leaflets on Government website still online

Reply: 6th June 2009

Dear Ms Primarolo

Thank you for your letter of 3rd June and your apology about the accidental error in the HPV factsheet. I had first identified and reported this via your FOI officer on 1st October 2008.

You state that the original version was removed at the time of publishing the revised version in November.
It appears that you have been given incorrect information for which you may not be aware.

However it is your responsibility to have knowledge of the true facts. It is now obvious that your department are not relaying the true facts to the general public, including me, when I had already pointed out the original error in the figures and then the fact that the old versions were still online in May. They are still online today, on various NHS websites. I am therefore forwarding details of the web addresses concerned as you request, so that the Department can ensure there is no misunderstanding.

Please find the following files attached:

Google search engine results 6.6.09
Email confirmation 6.6.09 - HPV VACCINE ERROR document still online today!
PDF file downloaded 6.6.09 from www.immunisation.nhs.uk
Screen photographs x 4, 6.6.09

Annotations may be found online at http://www.facebook.com/album.php?
aid=93703&id=520276478&l=31b0c6c4e5
.

As you know, there are girls around the country, including Surrey and here in Reigate, who have been off school for many weeks and months, directly following their vaccinations. They and their families are suffering greatly as a result, yet it is plainly evident now that they were supplied with unclear and inaccurate information from your department, right from the start, and very little effort was made to put things right.

I leave it to you to reconsider your views about a travesty, but I do look forward to receiving your further comments regarding the Government's position on this matter and your personal belief about supporting or celebrating this vaccine programme.



Yours sincerely


Grace Filby




22.5.09

Management in Practice ask if the vaccination programme should increase further


Grace Filby writes:


I've replied to yet another HPV vaccine online government propaganda announcement at

as follows:


No, the vaccination uptake does not need to increase further.
 
It is an exaggeration to say that it is crucial that the girls have these injections. The NHS staff have instructions to ensure that the programme is carried out but that is not the same thing as saying it is crucial for medical reasons.
 
There are various reasons why every girl needs to consider the pros and cons for herself.
 
First, there is a risk with any vaccine. This is why Cervarix is listed for the compensation payments scheme.
 
Secondly, I can assure you from my FOI question last October, that the NHS leaflet "Beating Cervical Cancer - the facts" has a major error in it on p.13 on the question of safety figures. I do not know if the current printed copies have been corrected, but certainly the old, incorrect wording was still accessible online on 14th May - the day after Dawn Primarolo's speech in reply to my MP Crispin Blunt's debate.  Here in Reigate there is a girl who has been increasingly crippled by the 3 injections and now the only help on offer is from private holistic therapy - osteopathy and homeopathy - fortunately, free of charge.
 
Thirdly, it is important to point out that there are other ways of preventing the spread of HPV viruses. These include the word No, the use of condoms, male circumcision, careful hygiene, clean clothes and bedsheets (and sunlight kills bacteria and viruses) - and of course, good nutrition, exercise and rest for a strong immune system. 
 
There are also certain circumstances when it is best to avoid being vaccinated. This might be if you have an existing medical condition, if your immune system is under stress - perhaps an infection that is already being treated with antibiotics.
 
In these vaccines there are chemical preservatives which are not naturally found in the body. With the HPV vaccine there is aluminium - in flu vaccines there is Thimerosal and in MMR vaccines there is Neomycin. All of these are rather toxic to living cells and there is strong scientific evidence that they have synergistic effects when added together...! With teenage hormones adding to the complex chemical mix, it is not difficult to follow that nerve cells are completely destroyed in lab culture experiments.
 
When there are other ways of preventing and treating HPV infections and anyway, the public have not been given the true facts and figures, maybe our girls would rather not believe everything word for word that they are told by the govt. campaign.
 
I can supply you with the links to the online FOI evidence on request. Remember, there are other, gentler and more natural ways of preventing and fighting infections.








Q: Is there a drug to counteract the side effects of the vaccine Cervarix?



A: Some, or most of the negative side effects of the vaccine may be reversed by the actual vaccine in homeopathic potency, but adjunctive homeopathic treatment may be required as well - this information is from an associate who is a qualified and experienced homeopath.

Holistic Health Alliance www.askhha.info
13.1.09



Still life: cervical cancer vaccine

Elizabeth Grace Filby's Facebook Profile

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 quotations about Guillain-Barré Syndrome and vaccines
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) naturally occurs in the population and is usually thought to be caused by a preceding infectious illness. There is no good evidence to suggest that Cervarix vaccine can cause the condition. It is important to note that the child's neurologist has been quoted as saying that "with complete certainty she is demonstrating no pathological reaction to her vaccination". The MHRA is closely monitoring the safety of Cervarix vaccine and our analysis of the expected background frequency of GBS indicates that this case does not exceed the number expected to have occurred anyway in the absence of vaccination".

Stephen Hallworth,
Media Relations Manager, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
18.12.08
info@mhra.gsi.gov.uk
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'The exact mechanisms that cause the conditions aren't clear, but about 60 per cent of those affected will have had a throat or intestinal infection, flu or MAJOR STRESS within the previous two weeks.'

Dr Tricia Macnair
http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/conditions/guillainbarre1.shtml

'About sixty percent of patients suffer from a throat or intestinal infections, influenza or STRESS symptoms in the previous two weeks.'

GBS Support Group
http://www.gbs.org.uk/quickguide.html

'The disorder came to public attention briefly when it struck a number of people who received the 1976 Swine Flu VACCINE.'

GBS Foundation International
http://www.gbs-cidp.org/aboutgbs.htm

'Occasionally, surgery or VACCINATIONS will trigger the syndrome. The disorder can develop over the course of hours or days, or it may take up to 3 to 4 weeks.'

National Institutes of Health
http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/gbs/gbs.htm

'All forms of Guillain-Barré syndrome are due to an immune response to foreign antigens (such as infectious agents or VACCINES)'

Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guillain-Barr%C3%A9_syndrome

'there was an unexpected increase — by a factor of four to eight — in the number of cases of the Guillain–Barré syndrome after a government-sponsored mass-inoculation program in which 45 million adults in the United States received VACCINE'

New England Journal of Medicine
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/339/25/1845

'does he not even know the known symptoms of poisoning of some of the VACCINE ingredients. Tween 80 and borax have effects of poisoning such as this' ... 'I could think of no better advert for parents to question vaccine safety'.

JABS Forum
http://www.jabs.org.uk:80/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=3357


'When new medicines come on to the market, we have only limited information about their safety. The new medicine will have been tested in clinical trials. However, these trials generally involve only small numbers of patients who take the medicine for a relatively short period of time, and there are strict conditions for the inclusion of patients in such trials.

This means that the patients in whom the medicines are tested may not be fully representative of the patients who will use the medicine when it is marketed. In addition, it is not until large numbers of patients have taken a drug that we can detect side effects which are rare or which appear after long-term use.

Close monitoring of new medicines once they are being more widely used in the general population enables us to identify such side effects and take appropriate action.'

MHRA - Black Triangle Drugs
http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Safetyinfo.......

'Because VACCINATION can trigger the condition, your grandson’s physicians are correct in denying flu shots.'

Dr Gott, New York
http://www.nwherald.com/articles/2008/12/16/.......

Sourced: 18.12.08 - Capital letters:GF






photo: by permissionHPV vaccination - image donated






















HPV vaccination programme with Year 8 girls

News alert: 16 October 2008
Reigate, UK

written by Grace Filby

A newspaper heading that the HPV vaccine is "essential" may be an exaggeration.


The human race has always been protected with nutrients such as Lycopene (in tomatoes), well-known Folic Acid and other vitamins essential for life, all found in a wide variety of fresh fruit and vegetables. There is plenty of strong scientific evidence that they prevent cervical cancer.


As for the viruses that cause warts, it may be a timely reminder that natural sunlight generally eradicates viruses, bacteria and moulds - on skin, clothes and bedding, and in the air. The added benefit of sunlight is that it builds up our reserves of vitamin D which has a profound effect on our immune systems, whereas indoor lifestyles, cigarette smoke and the contraceptive pill may make HPV-induced cancers more likely in later life.


As the Director of Public Health and the Head of Schools and Learning rightly pointed out in a letter to all Surrey's Head Teachers and Boards of Governors back in February, "we cannot entirely rule out the possibility that some girls could experience extremely rare vaccine adverse events". It is as well to be aware that, as of 3rd October, HPV was added to the Vaccine Payments Scheme. The amount payable is £120,000 'to ease the present and future burden of the vaccine-damaged person and their family'.


I hope that the Surrey schools’ decision to help with the campaign was not swayed by the statement that the vaccine is given as part of a schools based programme in other countries including the USA and Australia. In fact, the brand chosen by the UK is not the same one that is used in the USA or Australian schools. The American FDA has not approved it yet. Both manufacturers are working on some long term safety studies.

tomatoes - lycopene
Tomatoes: a rich source of protective lycopene

Teenagers do not like the thought of injections, let alone the thought of possible side effects, genital warts or cervical cancer. Perhaps the information about vitamins - the real essentials - will now encourage them to eat a healthy diet with plenty of fruit and vegetables instead of fizzy drinks and doughnuts. The information about sunlight might even encourage them to air their beds and spend some time out of doors every day.


There will always be people who want mass-vaccination campaigns but there are others who do not consider them all a 'must have', and prefer natural ways of protecting their family's health.


For anyone who is taking part in the Government's Year 8 Cervarix HPV programme, please would you advise your readers that the Department of Health's Green Book and the training slides for health professionals now state that the third dose should be at least six months after the first dose - not sooner than that.


There is one more point to make. I understand that aluminium adjuvants have not been rigorously studied for long-term safety. Although this common metal is very useful and has been added to vaccines for decades, aluminium has no known function in living cells. Will we find in years to come that there is neurological damage and symptoms associated with Parkinson's and Alzheimer's, or bone damage etc.?  Isn't it better to be safe than sorry?




News alert: 19 October 2008
Reigate, UK

written by Grace Filby

Parents and young girls are being directed to public information sites and leaflets about the HPV vaccines. Please be aware that some of the ‘facts’ may not be entirely accurate, up to date or accessible as yet.

For example, in England, since May 2008 the official published information about the safety of the HPV vaccines: “Beating Cervical Cancer – the Facts” stated  that “other mild side effects . . . were reported in less than one in 1000 people”.

In contrast, the GSK Patient Information Leaflet for Cervarix describes these side effects as “very common”, “common” etc. These descriptions with numerical figures are also confirmed in the Green Book for UK healthcare professionals (updated Sept.08).

I queried this anomaly in the factsheet with the Dept of Health on 1st October.

Their FOI reply confirms the error in the official factsheet:

”The human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV) factsheet was drafted to cover both HPV vaccines, and was printed before the selection of the HPV vaccine for use in the UK.  The advance printing was necessary to ensure that information materials would be distributed to allow sufficient time for local planning.  However, officials are grateful that you have pointed out this error.  The factsheet has been amended on the website and the Department will ensure that the next reprint of the HPV factsheet contains the correct information for Cervarix.”

However, the Welsh version of the same key factsheet “Beating Cervical Cancer – the Facts” published July 2008, does not contain the error.

Both factsheets  state that “As with all vaccines, its safety will continue to be monitored after it has been introduced into the national immunisation programme.” In other words, the long term safety studies are taking place now and the results are not yet known. Cervarix is not yet approved by the FDA in America. The manufacturers of Gardasil have committed to looking at the reported deaths and hospitalizations.

aluminium is added to many vaccines
Aluminium: no known function in living cells
The factsheets continue:  “HPV vaccine does not contain thiomersal”. In fact, the vaccine contains aluminium/aluminum.  It is unclear whether any long term safety studies have been done on this metal adjuvant in vaccines. This chemical element has no known function in healthy living cells but is linked with Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and other neurological disorders in later life.

The Dept. of Health  have provided this further information about vaccine damage:

black triangle






Cervarix is a black triangle drug (new, under intensive surveillance). ALL suspected adverse drug reactions should be reported

”Between 1 January 2003 and 6 October 2008, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is aware of 163 UK spontaneous suspected ADR reports of anaphylaxis and related reaction terms associated with vaccines through the Yellow Card Scheme.  MHRA is also aware of 73 suspected ADR reports for vaccines with a fatal outcome for the same period.”









Source: http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/3311/response/...






2.27min: Grace Filby reading a letter to the LIFE newspaper, published 25.9.08



 2.16 min: Grace Filby talking about her idea to check aluminium sensitivity first, published 1st November 2008

 
UP ON THE PHARM

Anon. Strictly Copyright: Designs For Wellbeing 2008

Thus spake a stranger cloaked in leaf of green,
Awakened by dark dreams of works obscene.
Dwarfed by King Pharma’s size, his ground he stood
Defining what should not be – and what should:

“What foul, insidious mischief stalks this earth?
That maids not yet of age to bear and birth
Should find themselves bestuck by your two cocks;
Twin princes: Gardasol and Cervarox?”

King Pharma laughed a laugh of 'laissez faire',
His multi product breath made sweet the air.
“My uncle was King Mammon you well know
But I eclipsed his glory long ago.”

“Dark advertising angels bowed his throne
Seducing all in what to do and own
While power-mad governments just followed on
Until all trace of Nature’s laws was gone.”

“Now on the back of great constructed need
;Licentiousness, on which the masses feed;
Ill health, disease and angst fill heart and mind         
With my ‘proprietaries’ not far behind!”

“I’m set to make a killing ‘saving life’
Now copulation’s cheap and running rife.
What care I fornication leaves kids cold?
I shall out-Midas Midas with my gold!”

The knotted brow and deeply berried eyes
Considered this old knave, in Kingly guise;
Surveyed King Pharma, half contempt, half grief.
And then was gone ... but for a single leaf.

The leaf – ignored – began to mould and spore!
It rose unseen when servants swept the floor
And turned the gold – of Pharma’s monstrous hoard;
To noble dust, that he could ill afford.

'Twas then word came that damsels oft fell sick
To one or other careless Princely Prick.
While gold-turned-mould, back home now worked its will
As one by one King Pharma’s court fell ill.

King Pharma’s wife fell sick, his daughters too;
Their intuitions he already knew.
They'd warned him of his folly long before;
Now came a certain knock upon the door.

The Green Man stood before him – taller now.
King Pharma made a low, instinctive bow.
“What must I do, this pestilence to ward?
Abject contrition all I can afford.”

“That more than pays all dues,” the Man replied.
“No man-made compound from my spores can hide.
With your ampoules and phials e’en as we speak
My myriad armies now play hide and seek.”

From his green cloak he plucked a second leaf.
The sick through its infusion found relief;
Then taking leave returned whence he had come.
Nature still reigned; with man still just as dumb.

All Maids grew unmolested, fit and strong.
As wives and mothers they lived hale and long.
King Pharma took to nature – almost manic
Went in for farming – strictly: all organic!






contact: grace[at]relax-well[dot]co[dot]uk


Copyright © Designs For Wellbeing 2000-10